Wednesday , February 24 2021
Home / News / withdraws VPN node from its warrant canary, hints at gag order withdraws VPN node from its warrant canary, hints at gag order withdraws VPN node from its warrant canary, hints at gag order the proclaimed VPN service provider, based in Seychelles has recently removed an exit node from its warrant canary, with a statement certifying that “no warrants, seizures or searches that have not been published in our Transparency Report, have taken place to the date of publication.”

Simply put, the questioned blog post said that “the users are informed that they do not wish to mention France 8 ( in their warrant canary until further notified.” If we go into little deep into the statement then, the statement implies that the France 8 node has been subjected to a warrant, but a gag order prohibits from revealing that fact directly to its users. Though it is still not clear who served the warrant and is not able to reveal that for obvious reasons.

However, following comment made by was recovered from, which said, “They recommend their users not to connect to this node anymore. Moreover, they are doing whatever it takes to include that node into their warrant canary again.”

Meanwhile, another VPN service provider noticed that despite the warning from “The France 8 node is continuing to be widely utilized by the users.”

Back in 2013, Ars wrote about and about its user privacy statement related to data handling and protection, the article did not catch much attention. The report also stated quoting Nate Cardozo, who is a staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation that the user policy is the single worst policy of its kind that he has ever seen.

However, as later developments has made significant changes to the terms of its ethical user policy, it was as a result of the criticism from the Electronic Frontier Foundation and also thanked the foundation for their criticism.

It is noteworthy that, the policy now states that, “they are based in Seychelles, and if any domestic laws or restriction is contradictory to their mission and values, they will not hesitate to shift to a new location.” Moreover, if they find themselves unable to find such place then they will submit themselves to corporate hara-kiri. They will close business and will provide a refund to their customers from the assets that they will be having at their disposal.

The promise made to commit corporate hara-kiri is a reference to the decision of the CEO of Lavabit, where they shut down their email company rather than providing real-time monitoring to one of its users.

Walking on the same footings earlier this year, Ars sister Reddit also made an announcement removing a “warrant canary” from its transparency report. This could very well be taken as an indirect signaling method and of their growing necessity in current time.

About Ali Raza

Ali Raza is a freelance journalist with extensive experience in marketing and management. He holds a master degree and actively writes about crybersecurity, cryptocurrencies, and technology in general. Raza is the co-founder of, too, a site dedicated to educating people on online privacy and spying.

Check Also

Unblock Facebook at School

Russia to Target Facebook After Attack on Telegram

Following the mass-blocking of millions of IP addresses in the battle against Telegram, Roskomnadzor, the …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *